
I wonder if Amanda Congdon, fomerly of
Rocketboom, expected any blowback from doing
these DuPont commercials? Industrial chemicals don't really seem like her kind of product. By contrast, Dove’s ad campaign is a better fit. She's a young, well-endowed, attractive, woman. Acting as a spokesperson for what is essentially a beauty product makes total sense for her. But DuPont and Amanda make a strange juxtaposition. This could be what's causing the current hubbub.
Personally, I have essential problems with DuPont’s business practices, its corporate ethics, political influence, and its status as a world polluter. But that's not the point here. Despite a concerted effort by their PR team, DuPont has had, and continues to have, chronic problems with pollution. Since Amanda Congdon is on the record as a supporter of things ‘green’ it makes you seem like a disingenuous spokesperson to do their web spots.
Her self-defense on her blog seems to be digging her deeper and deeper into an ethically compromised hole, claiming that because she is not an official journalist (she's a blogger thank-you-very-much) she doesn't have to follow the ethical guidelines that hedge in the mainstream media. Instead, she feels can write her own rulebook, redefine her own paradigms, and pretty much get away with anything she wants to do. To me this attitude doesn't represent the vanguard of new media, but the tactic of a selfish opportunist who is justifying actions she already knows are questionable by retroactively changing the context in which she originally made her decisions.
It's clearly a bluff, she probably doesn't believe herself either. Her actions speak too loudly. By associating herself with DuPont, Amanda Congdon is clearly in it for the money.
Labels: advertising, amanda congdon, dupont, media